The computer costs the same as it does in the Alpha Dawn rules (see p.41, and p.46 for the definitions), you simply add in the KH programs as you would the AD ones. The only difference for a ship is the addition of a panel...oftentimes the main computer is not readily accessed on a ship (on smaller craft it's tucked away out of sight, larger craft in an adjacent room or such). Each panel costs 100Cr, so each major station would require one (pilot, astrogator, and engineer stations for example). If your bridge is large enough to warrant the computer, I usually allow the astrogator to skip the panel as he is the top computer operator and the main computer already has said panel so it would go in with the astrogator's equipment where applicable. In other words, you have your mainframe somewhere and a few panels scattered about wherever any crewmember may need to access the computer from.

Also note that I mandate a few of the AD programs for ship operation...Analysis to assist astrogator plotting (level equal to the astrogation program), Industry for the hydroponics & machine shop (LVL:1 is sufficient for any craft, it can also accomodate Cargo Arms without using the associated KH program), and Maintenance to coordinate upkeep on the ship (LVL equal to # of drives as Alarm & DCR programs).

Also a Communication (LVL:1) program would be used to coordinate an intercom network that has more than one master panel, a Transportation program @ LVL:1 for any lift shafts, and a Commerce program @ LVL:1 for passenger/cargo manifests. Any Installation Security program can handle Skin Sensors along with any other additional security devices. Computer Security programs are nice to have if the mainframe is accessible via its own room (meaning not stuffed away into a cramped fighter or assault scout hull), and Robot Management programs are nice if you want 'bots onboard (especially maintenance robots to assist with repairs/upkeep).

 * Missiles & Computers: I've been going with one program for all launchers, although I've been contemplating exactly how many missiles one launcher can hold/fire and adjusting to one program per launcher. Haven't really itroned that one out yet, but until then since the rules don't clarify it I parallel it to assault rockets and torpedoes: one program for all launchers works.

Of course the rules also state only one AR or T can be fired at a time...hence the idea for multiple ICM programs since you can fire multiple ICMs.

 * Hull Points: p.22 of the KH Campaign Book details a method for additional hull points, namely sacraficing ADF & MR points for additional HP (and vice versa, HP can be exchanged for more performance). Barring that I go by my house rules at construction time, although I'd have to say the KH rule is also a construction-only option as well, as you can't remove/add/reinforce both additional hull plating/armor and infrastructure after it's complete.

Energy Weapons are inexpensive, and since they use ship's internal power rather than an outside source (powerpacks etc) it's why they're so favorable. Since an Ion or Atomic drive produces lots of energy, you never have to worry about reloading or recharging, unlike an assault rocket that misses its target...you only have so many ARs at your disposal so you can't afford to miss, especially if your reloading ship or station is millions of kilometers away from the battle.

The Rocket Weapons on the other hand are pricy, and since there are no range diffusion/modifiers you do have a better chance at hitting your target. However most of them are MPO weapons (meaning you can only use them during your movement phase, and not defensively) and all of them can only be used one at a time regardless of how many are loaded/equipped (which I think is a retarded ruling for Rocket Batteries, since a separate program is required for each one). Also, most of them chew up a lot of space (you can almost fit two laser cannons in the same space required by a single torpedo launcher, and an unloaded RB takes up far more space than any energy battery).

Streamlining isn't really covered much, aside from the statements that Assault Scouts are the largest starship that can land and any system ship up to HS:5 can land as well. That to me is another paradox, why can a HS:5 system ship land, but by merely swapping the chemical drives it can't? Even if you want to discuss the semantics anmd ethics of atomic drives operating in a populated atmosphere, it should still be physically capable of doing so (after all, an Assault Scout has atomic drives...). Anyways I utilize the +10% for any ship up to HS:5 (and install secondary chem drives/software for larger starships to land), applying said 10% to the cost of the hull (be it armored or not)

I'm not overly fond of Zeb's Guide...nor do I have any qualms stating why. 

My SF website