What follows are notes on how I plan to handle science and technology in some future campaign using SF rules and a variation on the default Frontier setting.

I'm going for a 'medium hard' sci fi feel. Not a lot of theory and not much technobabble, but most of the tech should work consistently and be at least somewhat plausible. FTL is a miracle, but a limited one.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

• Defensive screens, freeze fields, and the cryo-beds used in storage class travel all utilize nano-tech (No gray goo; attack swarms are the equivalent of expensive chemical weapons)

• subspace radio bandwidth is pretty tight

• hyper-drive is closely related to subspace radio (hyperspace is a different level of subspace)

• genetic engineering and other advanced medical tech= why humans live so long and are relatively hard to kill

• advanced psychology and social sciences allow for things like superior hypnotism

• no anti-grav tech (spin and thrust , mag boots, velcro, etc. instead)

• spacers use skeinsuits, defensive screens, acceleration couches/tanks, and drugs to avoid injury during dangerous acceleration, deceleration, and maneuvers

• Larger star craft don’t normally land on planets. Often use vertical deck layout. Not streamlined. Few/no windows.

• Small vessels/shuttles do land on planets, may use horizontal deck layout. Streamlined for trans-atmospheric flight. Windows with shutters/shields.

• The Sathar have demonstrated a frightening level of electronic warfare sophistication. The four races of the Federation have learned the hard way to avoid relying on things like wireless networked computers and automated spacecraft.

------------------------------------

Those are my notes as they stand now.

Questions:

1. Does this all make sense? Am I hitting my 'medium-hard' sci fi goal?
2. How do you handle science and tech as a referee (or, if you are mostly a player, how do you like to see these things handled)?